Why are our bodies soft and weak and smooth,Unapt to toil and trouble in the world,But that our soft conditions and our heartsShould well agree with our external parts?Come, come, you froward and unable worms!My mind hath been as big as one of yours,My heart as great, my reason haply more,To bandy word for word and frown for frown;But now I see our lances are but straws,Our strength as weak, our weakness past compare,That seeming to be most which we indeed least are.Then vail your stomachs, for it is no boot,And place your hands below your husband's foot:In token of which duty, if he please,My hand is ready; may it do him ease.
I chose Kates end speech to analyze because it completely disgusted me. After reading through it in class I was waiting for Mr. Klimas to say that Kate was just being completely sarcastic or something but I guess that’s too good to be true. I chose the bottom half because it found it more appalling than the first half. In the beginning of the book Kate was so head strong it was almost annoying. And now she is just as annoying only on the opposite of the scale. In the beginning of this passage she talks about how women’s bodies are “weak and smooth” on the outside. Then she says that a woman’s inside should match her definition of the outside. So basically act weak and inferior in all situations. All of the words she uses are words of submission. She feels now that it is her duty to serve him and not to stick up for herself.
I liked the comedy books the best out of all of the books we read. I thought it was interesting learning that pretty much the same things that make us laugh today is comparatively the same humor that made people laugh hundreds of years ago. In Mid-summers night dream having a man dress up as a donkey and act like immaturely was funny. I thought the beginning of Taming of the shrew was funny as well. Playing a prank such as they did in the beginning is something that we as a people would do now-a-days and we would get just as many laughs out of it.
As for the book itself, I enjoyed it better than Mid-Summers Night Dream. I thought the beginning of the book was funny, and the fact that it tied into the theme of the story was very clever. The beginning character was easily convinced that he was something he was not just because of the environment around him. He lost his identity because of his environment. Much the same happened to Kate. She was extremely headstrong in the beginning, but once she spent enough time with Horsentio, the environment he created for her changed her identity. She adapted to her surrounds which in my opinion is human nature. No one is born a criminal, not being able to feed their own stomachs forms this identity. Although I do not like the ending of the book, I can appreciate it because I believe that is exactly how it would happen. Maybe not as fast as it did in the book, but with him working at her, her flame would have been put out eventually. Much like most women in abuse relationships, they all know at the first hit that it wasn’t right, and probably stuck up for themselves at first, but they quickly learned that the more they fought back, the more they get. So they adapt to they environment to make it a little easier for themselves. The only part I do not like about this book is that it tries to make light of a situation that I don’t believe is very funny.
Saturday, June 7, 2008
Macbeth
MACBETH
Whence is that knocking?How is't with me, when every noise appals me?What hands are here? ha! they pluck out mine eyes.Will all great Neptune's ocean wash this bloodClean from my hand? No, this my hand will ratherThe multitudinous seas in incarnadine,Making the green one red.
Re-enter LADY MACBETH
LADY MACBETH
My hands are of your colour; but I shameTo wear a heart so white.
Knocking within
I hear a knockingAt the south entry: retire we to our chamber;A little water clears us of this deed:How easy is it, then! Your constancyHath left you unattended.
Knocking within
Hark! more knocking.Get on your nightgown, lest occasion call us,And show us to be watchers. Be not lostSo poorly in your thoughts.
In this scene alone Lady Macbeth mentions the words hands and water and obviously blood several times. The blood that Macbeth is talking about in the beginning of this passge is a symbol of all of the guilt that he is feeling. But Lady Macbeth just keeps telling him to wash the blood off of his hands with a little water. She tries to calm him down, make him see the brighter side of things by saying this. She tries to make him see that she is a women with a “ heart so white”. She thinks she is stronger than him in a mental sense. Its ironic now how she tells him that a little water can wash away his guilt but by the end of the play when she is washing her hands continuously she realizes the guilt is something deeper than what a “little water” can clean off.
The tragedy plays are just depressing. I am a reader that likes a happier ending, or at least something that I can laugh at. Shakespeare builds the tragedy using many tactics, however the giveaway that his was probably going to be a tragedy was the amount of power that Macbeth wanted. In my opinion if Richard III wasn’t already dubbed a history I think it could also be called a tragedy. His hunger for power is what caused his downfall. The same goes for Macbeth. Of course he had his Lady at his side to keep him in check. Change for the worst is how he creates the tragedy in Macbeth. Overall, Shakespeare obviously does a good job of creating a tragedy, I am just not the type of reader to enjoy it.
This book had its ups and downs. Even though I did not like fact that Lady Macbeth was so immoral, it was nice reading about a female character in Shakespeare’s book that was not a weak and hopeless character. It was funny that she was the one keeping her husband in check to get what he wanted. It somewhat reminded me of Player Piano, when Paul’s wife would keep him in check to exactly what he should be going to get ahead. However, much like in Taming of the Shrew, she ends up a wreck. I hate that every woman I have read about in Shakespeare’s plays in the end of the story end up this way. I enjoyed doing the more artsy project as an end project for this book. Overall, I feel like with all of these books they are better understood when they are seen preformed. That is what he originally wrote them for in the fist place.
Whence is that knocking?How is't with me, when every noise appals me?What hands are here? ha! they pluck out mine eyes.Will all great Neptune's ocean wash this bloodClean from my hand? No, this my hand will ratherThe multitudinous seas in incarnadine,Making the green one red.
Re-enter LADY MACBETH
LADY MACBETH
My hands are of your colour; but I shameTo wear a heart so white.
Knocking within
I hear a knockingAt the south entry: retire we to our chamber;A little water clears us of this deed:How easy is it, then! Your constancyHath left you unattended.
Knocking within
Hark! more knocking.Get on your nightgown, lest occasion call us,And show us to be watchers. Be not lostSo poorly in your thoughts.
In this scene alone Lady Macbeth mentions the words hands and water and obviously blood several times. The blood that Macbeth is talking about in the beginning of this passge is a symbol of all of the guilt that he is feeling. But Lady Macbeth just keeps telling him to wash the blood off of his hands with a little water. She tries to calm him down, make him see the brighter side of things by saying this. She tries to make him see that she is a women with a “ heart so white”. She thinks she is stronger than him in a mental sense. Its ironic now how she tells him that a little water can wash away his guilt but by the end of the play when she is washing her hands continuously she realizes the guilt is something deeper than what a “little water” can clean off.
The tragedy plays are just depressing. I am a reader that likes a happier ending, or at least something that I can laugh at. Shakespeare builds the tragedy using many tactics, however the giveaway that his was probably going to be a tragedy was the amount of power that Macbeth wanted. In my opinion if Richard III wasn’t already dubbed a history I think it could also be called a tragedy. His hunger for power is what caused his downfall. The same goes for Macbeth. Of course he had his Lady at his side to keep him in check. Change for the worst is how he creates the tragedy in Macbeth. Overall, Shakespeare obviously does a good job of creating a tragedy, I am just not the type of reader to enjoy it.
This book had its ups and downs. Even though I did not like fact that Lady Macbeth was so immoral, it was nice reading about a female character in Shakespeare’s book that was not a weak and hopeless character. It was funny that she was the one keeping her husband in check to get what he wanted. It somewhat reminded me of Player Piano, when Paul’s wife would keep him in check to exactly what he should be going to get ahead. However, much like in Taming of the Shrew, she ends up a wreck. I hate that every woman I have read about in Shakespeare’s plays in the end of the story end up this way. I enjoyed doing the more artsy project as an end project for this book. Overall, I feel like with all of these books they are better understood when they are seen preformed. That is what he originally wrote them for in the fist place.
Richard III
Richard:
And therefore, since I cannot prove a lover,To entertain these fair well-spoken days,I am determined to prove a villainAnd hate the idle pleasures of these days.Plots have I laid, inductions dangerous,By drunken prophecies, libels and dreams,To set my brother Clarence and the kingIn deadly hate the one against the other:And if King Edward be as true and justAs I am subtle, false and treacherous,This day should Clarence closely be mew'd up,About a prophecy, which says that 'G'Of Edward's heirs the murderer shall be.Dive, thoughts, down to my soul: hereClarence comes.
I chose this passage because I think it was an excellent way to begin the play. In class we had to keep asking ourselves why Shakespeare put certain passages into his books. This long speech that Richard begins by saying is important in developing the character of Richard. He begins by telling the audience of his physical deformity, which is where the beginning of this passage is. “And therefore, since I cannot prove a lover,..I am determined to prove a villain”. That basically means that since he cannot be what most people hold in their mind as handsome King material, that he will get his way being the vilian of the story. His words are dark, using words such as “deadly”, “hate” and “treacherous”. These words are all in direct contract to his language when he talks to Clarence. This sudden change of tone makes clear to the audience that Richard is hiding being his mask of deformity.
I enjoyed this book, so basing my opinion on Shakespeare’s history plays from this book alone is a positive one. I find history itself interesting. Reading a play rather than a text book is a diffewrent and in my oppion better way to learn about the past. Learning about Richards’s personality is more interesting than reading in a history book about all of the bad things he had done. The story was brought alive through this play. I also got to see how he got away with everything, his tactics of manipulation which is not something that is as easily understood when written in plain text. It is much like a chapter from Sound and Sense said. The intensity of some stories get better across in a more poetic form rather than in a history book.
I enjoyed this book as much as I possibly could with it getting closer and closer to the end of the year. I thought that the story itself was interesting. However I was getting sick of turning a page and the next 2 characters that were introduced a few pages ago had already been killed off. The dream scene after acting it out in class was almost humorous. The theme that fate or karma will always eventually catch up with a person was evedent in this scene. I thought the book moved at a quicker pace than the others we read. I found the language easier to understand as well, however there were so many characters to keep track of. Although I think this book could also be characterised as a tradegty, it is almost a humorous tradgety with the way it ended.
And therefore, since I cannot prove a lover,To entertain these fair well-spoken days,I am determined to prove a villainAnd hate the idle pleasures of these days.Plots have I laid, inductions dangerous,By drunken prophecies, libels and dreams,To set my brother Clarence and the kingIn deadly hate the one against the other:And if King Edward be as true and justAs I am subtle, false and treacherous,This day should Clarence closely be mew'd up,About a prophecy, which says that 'G'Of Edward's heirs the murderer shall be.Dive, thoughts, down to my soul: hereClarence comes.
I chose this passage because I think it was an excellent way to begin the play. In class we had to keep asking ourselves why Shakespeare put certain passages into his books. This long speech that Richard begins by saying is important in developing the character of Richard. He begins by telling the audience of his physical deformity, which is where the beginning of this passage is. “And therefore, since I cannot prove a lover,..I am determined to prove a villain”. That basically means that since he cannot be what most people hold in their mind as handsome King material, that he will get his way being the vilian of the story. His words are dark, using words such as “deadly”, “hate” and “treacherous”. These words are all in direct contract to his language when he talks to Clarence. This sudden change of tone makes clear to the audience that Richard is hiding being his mask of deformity.
I enjoyed this book, so basing my opinion on Shakespeare’s history plays from this book alone is a positive one. I find history itself interesting. Reading a play rather than a text book is a diffewrent and in my oppion better way to learn about the past. Learning about Richards’s personality is more interesting than reading in a history book about all of the bad things he had done. The story was brought alive through this play. I also got to see how he got away with everything, his tactics of manipulation which is not something that is as easily understood when written in plain text. It is much like a chapter from Sound and Sense said. The intensity of some stories get better across in a more poetic form rather than in a history book.
I enjoyed this book as much as I possibly could with it getting closer and closer to the end of the year. I thought that the story itself was interesting. However I was getting sick of turning a page and the next 2 characters that were introduced a few pages ago had already been killed off. The dream scene after acting it out in class was almost humorous. The theme that fate or karma will always eventually catch up with a person was evedent in this scene. I thought the book moved at a quicker pace than the others we read. I found the language easier to understand as well, however there were so many characters to keep track of. Although I think this book could also be characterised as a tradegty, it is almost a humorous tradgety with the way it ended.
Sunday, March 30, 2008
Victims
The speaker of this poem starts out as a young child and then midway through the poem switches to that same child as an adult. Again there is no particular rhyme or rhythm to this poem, however the commas and periods add pauses in all the best places. I it is easy to hear this daughter almost talking to her father, with such a spiteful tone.
I believe with this poem the tone takes a major role is developing its meaning. In the beginning, the little girl starts out so hateful of her father. “”When mother divorced you, we were glad.” Just this first line of the poem says a lot about her attitude towards her father when she was young. It goes on to say that as their father lost everything they “grinned” inside. However I think when she grows up there is a slight tone change. I believe her talking about the bums when she gets older is a metaphor connecting the bums with her father. Her father lost everything after the divorce, his family his cloths his job, and she was happy as it happened. The whole poem talks slowly about how her father loses his family job and then possessions. She specifically focuses on him losing his suits. “would they take your suits back, too, those dark carcasses hung in your closet”. And when she sees the bums she mentions something about their suits as well. “suits of compressed silt”. She does not feel remorse for her father, however instead of being so hateful it is more pity and speculation. What drives a man to loose everything until he sits in a row of bums so pathetically?
The next literary device that is essential to this poem it’s diction. When the girl talks about the suits she describes them as “dark carcasses”. Having such a dark description for such a simple item helps develop the tone in her voice as a child. The hate that she felt for her father. The way she describes the bums is also interesting. She almost describes them as shark like with, “white slugs of their bodies gleaming,..stained flippers of their hands, underwater fire of their eyes.” Its such a dark and angry description of a person. White slugs gets across the picture of a lazy man who does not see much sun. I believe their hands are stained from the wrongs they have committed against their families. And the underwater fire in their eyes are the evil inside of them. And she sees all of this in her own father which makes it easier for her to understand them, just not how they got to the point they are at.
I particularly liked the reference to Nixon in this poem. “We grinned inside, the way people grinned when Nixon’s helicopter lifted off the South Lawn for the last time”. This is a metaphor relating the way Nixon was a let down to the nation just as her father was a let down to her family. As for the overall poem, I thought having the speaker start out as a child and end as and adult was very clever. I liked the question that it rises in the reader at the end of the poem. I also like this poem because I think every person that reads it can get a different interpretation of it from their own experiences.
I believe with this poem the tone takes a major role is developing its meaning. In the beginning, the little girl starts out so hateful of her father. “”When mother divorced you, we were glad.” Just this first line of the poem says a lot about her attitude towards her father when she was young. It goes on to say that as their father lost everything they “grinned” inside. However I think when she grows up there is a slight tone change. I believe her talking about the bums when she gets older is a metaphor connecting the bums with her father. Her father lost everything after the divorce, his family his cloths his job, and she was happy as it happened. The whole poem talks slowly about how her father loses his family job and then possessions. She specifically focuses on him losing his suits. “would they take your suits back, too, those dark carcasses hung in your closet”. And when she sees the bums she mentions something about their suits as well. “suits of compressed silt”. She does not feel remorse for her father, however instead of being so hateful it is more pity and speculation. What drives a man to loose everything until he sits in a row of bums so pathetically?
The next literary device that is essential to this poem it’s diction. When the girl talks about the suits she describes them as “dark carcasses”. Having such a dark description for such a simple item helps develop the tone in her voice as a child. The hate that she felt for her father. The way she describes the bums is also interesting. She almost describes them as shark like with, “white slugs of their bodies gleaming,..stained flippers of their hands, underwater fire of their eyes.” Its such a dark and angry description of a person. White slugs gets across the picture of a lazy man who does not see much sun. I believe their hands are stained from the wrongs they have committed against their families. And the underwater fire in their eyes are the evil inside of them. And she sees all of this in her own father which makes it easier for her to understand them, just not how they got to the point they are at.
I particularly liked the reference to Nixon in this poem. “We grinned inside, the way people grinned when Nixon’s helicopter lifted off the South Lawn for the last time”. This is a metaphor relating the way Nixon was a let down to the nation just as her father was a let down to her family. As for the overall poem, I thought having the speaker start out as a child and end as and adult was very clever. I liked the question that it rises in the reader at the end of the poem. I also like this poem because I think every person that reads it can get a different interpretation of it from their own experiences.
The lost Baby Poem
The speaker of this poem is a mother that has just had an abortion. In the begging she tells of what she has done, and in the next stanza she describes what “could” have come for his unborn baby. Like the last Clifton poem I had read there was no particular rhyme scheme. There was no particular rhythm to the poem either. It was simply a mother telling her story. This is important in making poem more personal, like the reader gets to witness a mother telling her unborn child why she had ended her life so early.
The syntax of this poem is very important to note. Like many of Clifton’s poems, there are no periods or commas, and none of the personal nouns are capitalized. The poem in my opinion could be interpreted many different ways, I believe it is about a mother that has gone through an abortion. I think the I’s are not capitalized for two reasons. One even though the poem is about the justification for the abortion, I can still feel a sense of remorse the mother is feeling. Like many women after they get an abortion, she may not feel like she is worth being capitalized. She also many have kept the I’s lowercase so that they were not so personal, to make the statement that there are many mothers of her time that must do this to supposedly save their children. Another part of the syntax that’s stands out in this poem is the large spaces that are in the second and third stanza’s. In line 7-8”In the year of the disconnected gas and no car We would have made the thin walk over Genesee Hill into Canada wind..”. These spaces are important because when I read the poem, I could hear the mother talking, and at these spaces is where she needed to take a short pause to collect herself.
Another important literary device in this poem is diction. “the time i dropped your almost body down” (line1) The important word in this line is almost. The first time I read this poem I thought the mother had had her child and then drowned her. However there are many small clues that suggest that she had an abortion and the reference to drowning is just a piece of her that was once a part of her is now lost, dead, drowned. Another hint is in line 7 “You would have been born into winter”. The key word being would. The last word that gets across that the mother got an abortion is in the last stanza. In line 16 she says” If I am ever less than a mountain for tour definite brothers and sisters” The word definite is important because it means that they were real, they had been born. Also, in the last two lines it says “Let black men call me stranger always for your never named sake.” From the references of the city and under the river and traveling to Canada, I got the feeling that this particular mother lived in some ghetto in New York. The entire poem is her trying to justify why she got an abortion. I think the black men are the black pastors of her local church, and since she got an abortion they are not going to acknowledge her existence.
This poem is more personal to me because I am strongly against abortion. She spent most of the poem trying to defend herself. Her reasons are worthless. There is no good reason to “drown” a child. Her reasons were all speculation, she had no idea what was to come she only assumed it was going to be a harsh winter. But it was because of her bad decision making that she was in that situation in the first place. I thought it was interesting that in the first stanza she relates the abortion to the low rivers of the sea, and she ends with references to a mountain. She hopes to be mountain for her children that she chose to have, but if she isn’t she thinks she might as well drown as well.
The syntax of this poem is very important to note. Like many of Clifton’s poems, there are no periods or commas, and none of the personal nouns are capitalized. The poem in my opinion could be interpreted many different ways, I believe it is about a mother that has gone through an abortion. I think the I’s are not capitalized for two reasons. One even though the poem is about the justification for the abortion, I can still feel a sense of remorse the mother is feeling. Like many women after they get an abortion, she may not feel like she is worth being capitalized. She also many have kept the I’s lowercase so that they were not so personal, to make the statement that there are many mothers of her time that must do this to supposedly save their children. Another part of the syntax that’s stands out in this poem is the large spaces that are in the second and third stanza’s. In line 7-8”In the year of the disconnected gas and no car We would have made the thin walk over Genesee Hill into Canada wind..”. These spaces are important because when I read the poem, I could hear the mother talking, and at these spaces is where she needed to take a short pause to collect herself.
Another important literary device in this poem is diction. “the time i dropped your almost body down” (line1) The important word in this line is almost. The first time I read this poem I thought the mother had had her child and then drowned her. However there are many small clues that suggest that she had an abortion and the reference to drowning is just a piece of her that was once a part of her is now lost, dead, drowned. Another hint is in line 7 “You would have been born into winter”. The key word being would. The last word that gets across that the mother got an abortion is in the last stanza. In line 16 she says” If I am ever less than a mountain for tour definite brothers and sisters” The word definite is important because it means that they were real, they had been born. Also, in the last two lines it says “Let black men call me stranger always for your never named sake.” From the references of the city and under the river and traveling to Canada, I got the feeling that this particular mother lived in some ghetto in New York. The entire poem is her trying to justify why she got an abortion. I think the black men are the black pastors of her local church, and since she got an abortion they are not going to acknowledge her existence.
This poem is more personal to me because I am strongly against abortion. She spent most of the poem trying to defend herself. Her reasons are worthless. There is no good reason to “drown” a child. Her reasons were all speculation, she had no idea what was to come she only assumed it was going to be a harsh winter. But it was because of her bad decision making that she was in that situation in the first place. I thought it was interesting that in the first stanza she relates the abortion to the low rivers of the sea, and she ends with references to a mountain. She hopes to be mountain for her children that she chose to have, but if she isn’t she thinks she might as well drown as well.
On Reading Poems to a Senior Class at South high
The speaker of this poem is a teacher that is going to read poetry to a class of seniors. There is no rhyme of rhythm to this poem. What this poem uses to get across the message is syntax. The paragraphs are specifically broken up into sections that the authors wants analyzed. He did not use any punctuation, just simply paragraph spacing to make his point. The best example of this is line 22 “Where we all leaked out”. I believe this line is isolated to show emphasis on the fact that all it takes is a bell for everything that they had accomplished in the period to leak out. The line has more meaning by itself, which is why it is like that.
The first literary device i want to point out about this poem is the first simile in the poem. It is what opens up the poem, and takes them into the “fish world” “I noticed them sitting there as orderly as frozen fish in a package.” (lines 3-5) This is an interesting way to describe students in a classroom. This simile is important to the poem in making the transition from classroom to underwater world.
I believe the rest of the poem is just one long extended metaphor. Berry is relating the students he is reading his poetry to to fish. He says “I tried to drown them with my words that they had only opened up like gills for them and let me in” I believe this is a teacher that expected this period to be like any other period of his day. He was going to read the same poems to a new group of seniors and he expected that they were going to not be very interested in what he was going to read. However, as the poem takes off I believe he relates these children to fish because they seem to take some interest in what he is reading and telling them. “Together we swam around the room like thirty tails whacking words”. The ideas were going everywhere, the class is participating, and the teachers excitement level is at its peak at this point in the poem. This metaphor adds meaning to this poem because without it it would be hard to paint a picture of the teachers excitement as well as the students enthusiasm in only two 2 stanzas.
I liked this poem because it reminded me of a few classes that I have had this year. Those classes that are usually boring and we have to go through the same old criteria until the teacher hits something that a few students are interested in. All it takes in one opinion and the classroom takes off. I believe the poem is so fast moving and ends so quickly because that about how long those moments last. Sitting through a class period that everyone is interested in what is going on goes by so quickly. I especially liked the ending of the poem when he says “my cat licked my fins tell they were hands again”. It took him till he was home for his excitement level to go back down.
The first literary device i want to point out about this poem is the first simile in the poem. It is what opens up the poem, and takes them into the “fish world” “I noticed them sitting there as orderly as frozen fish in a package.” (lines 3-5) This is an interesting way to describe students in a classroom. This simile is important to the poem in making the transition from classroom to underwater world.
I believe the rest of the poem is just one long extended metaphor. Berry is relating the students he is reading his poetry to to fish. He says “I tried to drown them with my words that they had only opened up like gills for them and let me in” I believe this is a teacher that expected this period to be like any other period of his day. He was going to read the same poems to a new group of seniors and he expected that they were going to not be very interested in what he was going to read. However, as the poem takes off I believe he relates these children to fish because they seem to take some interest in what he is reading and telling them. “Together we swam around the room like thirty tails whacking words”. The ideas were going everywhere, the class is participating, and the teachers excitement level is at its peak at this point in the poem. This metaphor adds meaning to this poem because without it it would be hard to paint a picture of the teachers excitement as well as the students enthusiasm in only two 2 stanzas.
I liked this poem because it reminded me of a few classes that I have had this year. Those classes that are usually boring and we have to go through the same old criteria until the teacher hits something that a few students are interested in. All it takes in one opinion and the classroom takes off. I believe the poem is so fast moving and ends so quickly because that about how long those moments last. Sitting through a class period that everyone is interested in what is going on goes by so quickly. I especially liked the ending of the poem when he says “my cat licked my fins tell they were hands again”. It took him till he was home for his excitement level to go back down.
Good Times
This poem is written from the viewpoint of the eyes of a young uneducated child. Having the speaker of the poem be a child makes the poem more personal, making the reader be able to celebrate with her. The Childs language is crude, in sentences such as “the lights is back on”, and “they is good times.” The last two lines however seem to be spoken from the same child as an adult, telling her own children to think about “the good times” when the bad times come. There is no particular rhyme scheme, this poem did not need one. It created its own rhythm with the use of repetition.
The use of repetition is a key literary device in this poem. The word “is” is repeated several times throughout the poem. There is emphasis on this word not only because it is repeated several times but also because it is used grammatically the wrong way. Using the word “is” incorrectly throughout the poem could give the reader a sense of life for the child, and her education. It could also be repeated because the speaker wants to keep the “good times” in present tense. The word “and” is also repeated several times throughout the poem. In the first stanza, the word and is used for the girl to tell how everything on this day is finally turning around for the better in her life and for her family. They finally got some money to pay off the bills and it was time to celebrate. In the second stanza she lists everything they are going to do to celebrate.
The syntax of this poem is unique. There are no periods, commas or exclamation marks used even though this young girl is talking about a very exciting time in her life. What is great about the poem is that it needs no punctuation to get the same energized message across. “Oh these is good times good times good times.” (lines 12-15) The repetition and rhythm of the poem paint a clear picture of excitement all by themselves. Just glancing at the poem without reading it tells a lot about it. The lines are short and brief. I know when I get excited about something that’s really big in my own life I don’t have big long sentences to say. The way the poem is designed is much like a young child would say it.
I liked the two poems written by this author that the book provides. I looked up a little bit about the author and her poems made even more sense than they did before. She grew up in a ghetto town, and wrote her peoms about her life and family. I could picture a small child that is used to the lights being out and strange men coming over and upsetting her parents. But then all of a sudden they have power and the man is gone and her whole family is smiling and celebrating. This poem describes a specific time, but is one of many times im sure within her life. I could picture from the language that she probably lived in the south, and that the times were hard. Although the girl is very excited throughout the poem, when I read it I had mixed emotions. I was happy for her family and for their temporary financial stability, however, it makes me feel bad for all of the things I take for granted.
The use of repetition is a key literary device in this poem. The word “is” is repeated several times throughout the poem. There is emphasis on this word not only because it is repeated several times but also because it is used grammatically the wrong way. Using the word “is” incorrectly throughout the poem could give the reader a sense of life for the child, and her education. It could also be repeated because the speaker wants to keep the “good times” in present tense. The word “and” is also repeated several times throughout the poem. In the first stanza, the word and is used for the girl to tell how everything on this day is finally turning around for the better in her life and for her family. They finally got some money to pay off the bills and it was time to celebrate. In the second stanza she lists everything they are going to do to celebrate.
The syntax of this poem is unique. There are no periods, commas or exclamation marks used even though this young girl is talking about a very exciting time in her life. What is great about the poem is that it needs no punctuation to get the same energized message across. “Oh these is good times good times good times.” (lines 12-15) The repetition and rhythm of the poem paint a clear picture of excitement all by themselves. Just glancing at the poem without reading it tells a lot about it. The lines are short and brief. I know when I get excited about something that’s really big in my own life I don’t have big long sentences to say. The way the poem is designed is much like a young child would say it.
I liked the two poems written by this author that the book provides. I looked up a little bit about the author and her poems made even more sense than they did before. She grew up in a ghetto town, and wrote her peoms about her life and family. I could picture a small child that is used to the lights being out and strange men coming over and upsetting her parents. But then all of a sudden they have power and the man is gone and her whole family is smiling and celebrating. This poem describes a specific time, but is one of many times im sure within her life. I could picture from the language that she probably lived in the south, and that the times were hard. Although the girl is very excited throughout the poem, when I read it I had mixed emotions. I was happy for her family and for their temporary financial stability, however, it makes me feel bad for all of the things I take for granted.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)